Discover risky AI and data activity
Discover regulated, confidential, and business-critical data, classify what matters, and understand who can reach it before control decisions start.
Platform overview
One customer-owned control plane, three product modules, and a clearer enterprise review path.
Tutela helps organizations discover risky AI and data activity, understand what is actually exposed, and govern remediation from a customer-owned control plane.
Relationship diagram
How the platform fits together.
Start with the product question in front of your team, then move deeper without losing the platform context that ties data, AI, exposure, and operating proof together.
Data Security
Use Data Security to build the sensitive-data map, access context, and protection priorities that anchor the review.
Agentic Security
Use Agentic Security when employee AI use, prompts, files, and outputs need policy-backed workflow governance.
Exposure Validation
Use Exposure Validation when the team needs to validate exploitable paths, assign remediation, and prove what changed.
Customer-owned control plane
Keep architecture, deployment review, remediation evidence, and release discipline inside the same customer-owned operating model.
Product modules
Each module answers a different enterprise security question.
Tutela Data Security
Sensitive data is spread across cloud environments, applications, and business workflows. Teams need to know what matters, who can reach it, and which controls should come first without drowning in raw inventory.
Outcome
View productHelp security teams move from scattered inventory to a clearer view of sensitive data, risky access, and the next protection decision.
Tutela Agentic Security
Employees and internal tools can expose sensitive data through prompts, files, connected tools, and model outputs. Security teams need controls that follow the workflow without losing operational visibility.
Outcome
View productHelp AI and security teams govern employee AI use before it becomes an invisible data exposure problem.
Tutela Exposure Validation
Exposure programs accumulate findings from cloud, code, identity, and vulnerability tooling, but the queue rarely explains exploitability, remediation ownership, or closure proof. Teams need validated posture evidence instead of another backlog.
Outcome
View productHelp teams answer whether they are exposed, whether it can be exploited, what matters first, who owns remediation, and whether the fix worked.
Review sequence
Use the right document at the right review stage.
Orientation
Explain the platform, agree on the first product question, and align the buying team.
Go to orientationProduct evaluation
Move into the right product overview or technical brief once the first question is clear.
Go to product evaluationArchitecture and deployment
Pressure-test operating boundaries, identity, secrets, and ownership before rollout discussions go deeper.
Go to architecture and deploymentApproval readiness
Use controls mapping and evaluation checklists to support internal approval and procurement review.
Go to approval readinessBuyer entry points
Route the review by the role that owns the question.
Security leaders
Use the leader path when the team needs platform framing, deployment posture, and an internal decision story.
Explore roleSecurity practitioners
Use the practitioner path when the team needs architecture detail, workflow placement, and operator proof.
Explore roleData and AI leaders
Use the data and AI path when employee AI use, sensitive data, and workflow governance need the same language.
Explore roleRead this next
Move from platform understanding into the right evaluation asset.
Start with the Buyer Guide if the team still needs stakeholder alignment, or move into the Architecture Brief when deployment questions are already on the table.